Fix passing labels from Airflow connections to BQ jobs#65663
Merged
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Apr 22, 2026
Merged
Fix passing labels from Airflow connections to BQ jobs#65663kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
8d8fcce to
2070319
Compare
kaxil
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2026
|
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to check our Issue Tracker for additional contributions. |
59 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current documentation on BigQuery suggests that the logic of adding labels that were set in the Airflow connection should be also expected in the labels section of the created Big Query Job:
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-google/stable/connections/bigquery.html
So this current flow looks like a bug, that should be fixed.
This PR merges connection-level labels into the job configuration before the job is submitted.
The new behavior is:
If the operator config has no labels, it copies labels from the connection.
If the operator config already has labels, it merges them.
If the same label key exists in both places, the operator config wins.
If the operator explicitly sets labels=None, that stays unchanged.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.